UKR
ENG
Almanac of international law
Homepage
About journal
Editorial board
For authors
Requirements
Review
Archive
partners
Contacts
International Law Almanac, 05, 2014
Title page
Contents
INTERNATIONAL LAW ON HUMAN RIGHTS
M. BEM International legal views of R. Lemkin concerning the qualification of the certain historical facts of the massive human rights violations as a crime of “genocide”
S. HRAB Inclusive education in international law
T. ZAVOROTCHENKO Realization of political rights and freedoms of citizens by the international legal acts: theoretical and legal discourse
S. KLIM Peculiarities of implementation of the right of the child to family in prison
I. PTASHNYK Analysis of the work of the amnesty international and human rights watch in the sphere of economic and social rights
V. SELEZNYOV Unification of norms and mechanisms of implementation of european law on human rights as a factor of defragmentation of international law on human rights
A. CHERNIAVSKYI The institute of asylum in the contemporary international law
PEACEFUL MEANS OF SETTLING INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES
S. BURMA Legal basis and features of application of amicable settlement on the complaint against Ukraine in the European court of human rights
A. HARKUSHA Private parties’ rights & interest regarding the access to WTO dispute settlement system
V. KONONENKO Judicial settlement of international disputes
LAW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
T. ANTSUPOVA Honouring the commitments by member states of the council of Europe: monitoring mechanism
O. BOLHOV Normative consolidation of the status of modern operations of UN peacekeeping
O. VOLOSHCHENKO-VISLOBOKOVA Religious organizations in international relations (through the example of the World Council of Churches, the Russian Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches)
M. KATSYN Law provision of transformation of the Customs Union into the European Single Market
PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
I. DIKOVSKA Cooperation as obligation of parties of international private contract
M. LEV Lack of jurisdiction as a basis to refuse the recognition and enforcement of the EU countries’ judgements (the example of England)